By Javar Juarez
Last nights presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, moderated by Linsey Davis and David Muir, was a striking display of two radically different approaches and personalities. From the outset, the contrast between the two candidates was palpable, even if one had watched with the sound turned off.
A Tale of Two Candidates
Donald Trump appeared visibly hunched, angry, and frequently squinting, often shouting and interrupting himself mid-thought. His frustration was evident throughout the debate, with his demeanor characterized by negativity and a lack of focus. In stark contrast, Kamala Harris seemed light on her feet, exuding calm and confidence. Her expressions often conveyed puzzlement at Trump’s erratic behavior, reinforcing the visual disparity between the two. Harris’ composure was especially notable when juxtaposed against Trump’s apparent struggle to maintain coherence. As Trump strained to articulate his points, Harris maintained a steady focus, effectively underscoring her preparedness and poise.
Contentious Claims and Bizarre Assertions
Trump's rhetoric centered around repeated claims and unusual assertions. He argued that world crime rates were not an explanation for America’s high crime rates, made unsubstantiated statements such as all Democrats wanted Roe v. Wade overturned, and bizarrely suggested that it is legal to kill children in the United States. He even claimed to have seen something on television about people eating dogs, presenting it as factual.
Harris, meanwhile, remained on message, focusing on her campaign’s goals and policy points while also directly challenging Trump. She called out Trump for his financial mismanagement, noting his bankruptcies despite inheriting a large fortune, and criticized his handling of foreign policy, particularly regarding the Russia-Ukraine war. At one point, she pointedly asked Trump to explain to the 800,000 Polish Americans in Pennsylvania why he would favor a dictator over their safety.
The Visuals Speak Volumes
The visual dynamics of the debate were telling. Trump’s refusal to make eye contact with Harris, coupled with his tense posture and erratic interruptions, suggested an inability to handle the pressure. Harris, on the other hand, appeared empathetic yet firm, at times looking at Trump with a mix of pity and disbelief. Her body language reinforced her verbal arguments, presenting her as a leader in control of her faculties and the debate stage.
Harris’ performance was marked by her ability to pivot from attacks to substantive points. She highlighted her policy priorities, such as her economic agenda and support for marginalized communities, while consistently bringing the conversation back to Trump's shortcomings.
Critical Moments and Key Exchanges
One of the debate’s most significant moments came when Harris addressed Trump's handling of January 6th, pointing out his failure to take responsibility for the security breach. She underscored that the role of the Commander-in-Chief is to protect the country, which Trump failed to do by remaining inactive for hours as the Capitol was attacked.
Harris also effectively dismantled Trump's stance on abortion, pointing out the real-world consequences of his policies, such as women being unable to receive care after miscarriages and young survivors of incest facing dangerous choices. She directly challenged Trump's false claim that most Americans wanted Roe v. Wade overturned, which to many was the worst lie of last night's debate.
A Tactical Victory for Harris
Throughout the debate, Harris managed to keep her focus on substantive issues while also destabilizing Trump by highlighting his inconsistencies and falsehoods. She adeptly used his weaknesses against him, referencing his repeated grievances and obsession with past slights to paint a picture of a candidate who was out of touch and obsessed with personal vendettas. By the end of the debate, Harris had successfully presented herself as the adult in the room, a leader focused on solutions rather than petty squabbles. Trump, on the other hand, appeared tired, erratic, and unable to present a coherent vision for the future.
Conclusion: A Clear Winner?
While the outcome of the upcoming election remains uncertain, the debate provided a clear view of two contrasting candidates: a poised, prepared leader in Kamala Harris and a former president seemingly struggling to maintain his composure. If debate performances are any indicator, Harris emerged as the clear victor, effectively communicating her vision and exposing her opponent’s weaknesses.
As the election nears, voters will have to decide which candidate’s approach they find more compelling. But one thing is certain: this debate will be remembered for its stark contrast in style, substance, and temperament.
Support CUBN Today: Empower Progressive Black-Owned Media
Join us in supporting the Columbia Urban Broadcast Network (CUBN), the only progressive, Black-owned media outlet dedicated to amplifying voices and telling stories from within our community. Your contribution, even as little as $1, can make a meaningful difference. To support, please donate via Cash App at $CUBNSC. Together, let's continue to uplift our community and ensure its stories are told with integrity and authenticity.
Comments